![]() ![]() These comments have been slightly edited for length and clarity. It is a test of whether the thing can last. And that’s in a category in itself in American history, the Civil War and the death and misery. But this is the gravest political crime since secession. That is why President Lincoln said at the battlefield at Gettysburg that the question before the nation is whether a nation of, by and for the people can long endure. And not only that, the core story of the American experiment is a fight within itself to be true to the radical promise of democracy. And the reason is that for 159 years after the cannons fire on Fort Sumter, there is an unbroken chain of peaceful transfer of power. This is in the canon of American events: Jan. We all saw him engage in the conspiracy to defraud the United States. Of course it was a conspiracy to defraud the United States. There’s a kind of ballast to it. Of course this was corrupt. If that is not a crime, then nothing is a crime. So that part of it I find really important and gratifying. If Trump's 2020 election scheme wasn’t a crime, then nothing is a crime. Somehow, I suspect he won’t.Ĭhris Hayes speaking on MSNBC moments ago: ![]() Now Trump is closer than ever to being found liable for “everything he did while he was in office.” If McConnell is a man of his word, he will stand up for the special counsel’s investigation and demand that the criminal justice system he extolled be allowed to take its course. And former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one. We have a criminal justice system in this country. He didn’t get away with anything yet - yet. President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run. But McConnell argued that Trump could - indeed, should - be held to account: Addressing his colleagues and the watching public, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sought to justify voting against impeachment while also believing that “Trump’s actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty.” To untangle this logical pretzel, he found a technicality: Trump had already left office, so impeachment was not the proper remedy. 13, 2021, 43 Republican senators voted against impeaching Trump for his actions during and around the Jan. This obviously never came to fruition, but it captures the scope of authoritarian thinking that was flowing in the White House in those final days of Trump’s term. In other words, what Clark was allegedly proposing as the solution to a mass uprising on behalf of democracy was military suppression. The Insurrection Act is a law that allows the president to deploy the military domestically and use it to quash rebellions and enforce the law. 3, 2021, Philbin allegedly attempted to discourage Clark from trying to take on the role of acting attorney general, and reiterated that “there had not been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that if the Defendant remained in office nonetheless, there would be 'riots in every major city in the United States.'" The indictment alleges that Philbin responded, “That’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.” One of the most chilling exchanges captured in the indictment is a back-and-forth between deputy Trump White House counsel Patrick Philbin and Co-Conspirator 4, who appears to be Jeffrey Clark, a former top Justice Department official in the Trump administration.Īccording to the indictment, on Jan. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |